CNN International: Interview with Nigeria's Obasanjo and USAfricaonline.com Publisher Chido Nwangwu on Democracy and Security Issues
![]()

USAfricaonline.com,
first African-owned U.S.-based professional newspaper to be published
on the internet, is listed among the world's hot sites by the
international newspaper, USAToday. USAfrica has been cited by the New
York Times as America's largest African-owned multimedia company.
8303 SW Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77074.
Phone: 713-270-5500. Cell direct:
832-45-CHIDO (24436)
On the Prof. Chinua Achebe project, log on to www.Achebebooks.com
CLASS
magazine
'the Ebony
magazine for Africans in north America'
www.PhotoWorks.Tv
: Our community's digital domain for your pictures and special
events
USAfrica
INSIGHT
Nigeria and burden of the fraudulent
2007 elections
By Dr. CHIDI AMUTA
http://www.usafricaonline.com/chidiamuta.ngrelecfraud.html
Special to USAfricaonline.com, CLASS magazine, USAfrica The Newspaper, Houston and The Black Business Journal
of pubic office and compromises the integrity of those who exercise
sovereignty on behalf of the people. In the end, the moral credential
of the leadership is called to question and the effectiveness of such
a government as an instrument for the pursuit of the common good
through a rigorous distinction between right and wrong is lost.
The executive becomes a gathering of usurping bandits. The
legislative arm has no moral anchor from which to make laws except
laws fit for pirates while the judiciary is called upon to salvage
its reputation only in civil matters of a private nature, for
disputes between organs of the state become disputes among
illegitimates. In the worst of cases, every arm of the state is too
steeped in muck to even touch the constitution let alone govern by
it.
May 24, 2007, Lagos: In the unsettling aftermath of the 2007 general elections, we come face to face with a rather uncanny choice: to accept the outcome of an electoral fraud or allow the nation to degenerate into anarchy. Quite understandably, the thrust of domestic political opinion is today is ranged on both sides of this unwholesome divide. Similarly, international impressions about Nigeria are likely to be coloured by the shadow of those bad elections.
For the triumphant ruling party (PDP), all is fair in politics as in war. What happened was not rigging. It was superior politics and creative electioneering. The better party won. Political hard work has been rewarded. Losers should concede, dry their tears and go home to their disappointed wives and devastated kinsmen. Acceptance of that outcome, questionable as it may seem, constitutes, in the view of the chivalrous PDP , the basis for continuing national stability. Those who question the moral basis of their victory are 'enemies of democracy.'
On their part, the incoherent opposition have continued to cry foul. What happened was not an election. It was a massive fraud. Their answer to this fraud is to threaten to contest the legitimacy of the imminent PDP governments if possible on the streets through 'mass action', an open invitation to the kind of anarchy that breeds civil strife. To them, the electoral fraud perpetuated by their triumphant opponents is the real obstacle to democracy and the PDP the greatest 'enemy of democracy.' To go to the election tribunals would amount to dignifying an outrage and mistaking a fraud for an election.
So far the response of the ordinary Nigerian has been a mixture of helpless acceptance and unspoken revulsion. People have not heeded the call of the opposition for civil unrest not because it lacks merit but because the opposition itself lacks both the credibility and coherence to be taken seriously.
The PDP stance is an uncanny political one while the opposition's position is mostly ultimately moralistic. Unfortunately, politics and morality do not sleep comfortably in the same room. Elections are about political outcomes. They are not necessarily moral contests. Even in the best of democracies, while a morally correct position can be a political asset, it does not always guarantee electoral victory. Politicians win elections first and preach morality later.
Interestingly, it would appear that the gradual coming of age of
Nigeria's civil society accounts for the relative popular
indifference to the conflicting interpretations of the opposing
political camps. Quite uncharacteristically and very happily indeed,
while both sides can lay claim to some followership, there is, in my
view, no perceivable threat to the peace and stability of the nation
as a result of this political divide. I cannot see too many Nigerians
who want to troop out to die for either the PDP or the so-called
opposition.
Most reasonable people, concede that the PDP victory, while
understandable, is in many places mathematically nonsensical.
Similarly, there are people, even in Mr. Yar'dua's PDP or the larger
geographical North, who insist that the opposition as a whole
probably stood a chance of getting a few more votes if its rigging
machinery was nearly as sophisticated as that of the ruling party. I
have not yet come across too many people who are prepared to bet that
the absence of creative vote counting by the ruling party would have
returned any of the opposition candidates as president.
No doubt, the subdued partisan grand standing is likely to go on for some time after the inauguration of Umar Yar'dua on 29th May. That is quite understandable. People have lost money, have had their hopes for high political office dashed (some for life). Others have had their lofty egos bruised while yet others cannot face their financiers and followers to explain their loss in an economy so dependent on politics for access to wealth and opportunity.
But the national interest is best served if we interpret the partisan affray into a contest of antithetical possiblities. Clearly the choice is between accepting an electoral outcome largely compromised by considerable malpractice and outright fraud on the one hand and agreeing to a descent into anarchy as a way of redressing the fraud on the other. Neither possibility qualifies as a basis for the sustenance of democracy or indeed the survival of the nation.
Electoral fraud belongs in the realm of political fidelity and public morality. Even in the most advanced democracies however, public morality is an area of perennial lively debate. It is immaterial whether the issue is Monica Lewinsky's stained dress, the Florida electoral fraud, the presence of 'Ghana must go' Naira bags at the Nigerian national Assembly. At its extreme, massive electoral fraud as we have seen in the last elections is a scandalous compromise of the most critical ritual of liberal democracy: the electoral process itself.
The convenient argument is that once that process is flawed, those whom it produces cannot command legitimacy. A nation that selects its leaders through a fraudulent electoral process undermines the sanctity of pubic office and compromises the integrity of those who exercise sovereignty on behalf of the people. In the end, the moral credential of the leadership is called to question and the effectiveness of such a government as an instrument for the pursuit of the common good through a rigorous distinction between right and wrong is lost. The executive becomes a gathering of usurping bandits. The legislative arm has no moral anchor from which to make laws except laws fit for pirates while the judiciary is called upon to salvage its reputation only in civil matters of a private nature, for disputes between organs of the state become disputes among illegitimates. In the worst of cases, every arm of the state is too steeped in muck to even touch the constitution let alone govern by it.
But if the institutions of democracy are strong, the moral blithe of an electoral fraud can be healed, over time, by the rigorous applications of the rule of law: petitions, tribunals, litigation, independent research into what really happened and a collective resolve to fine tune and cleanse the electoral process by enlightened civil society. Florida produced the Bush presidency but the US Supreme Court and the Congress largely succeeded in retrieving the moral soul of America from the fraud of Florida.
A fierce contestation of political fraud if allowed to shift to the streets could breed anarchy. Anarchy has devastating and sometimes terminal political implications. In an anarchy, there is neither society nor polity. No institutions. No values. There is no venue for deliberation on morality because anomie is the rule. There is neither security nor order because the law of the jungle admits of neither.
Of course anarchy has an ethic, it creates an ethos and evolves a tragic logic: it includes the dark cycle of rape, murder, arson and brigandry. In recent Afrcan history as exemplified by Sierra Leone, democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan's Darfur region, Liberia and Somalia, anarchy glorifies the hacking off of limps, the dismemberment of infants, the indiscriminate creation of orphans and widows. Child soldiers, endless streams of refugees, sacked cities and treasuries, a sea of destitutes and exiles: these are the standard harvests of an anarchic situation.
Confronted with these two options, the choice becomes simpler. The
nation must survive preferably as a democracy first. Of course it
should not build its democratic tradition on fraud or unquestioning
acquiescence to crooked ways. But we should also not ruin our chances
of collective survival by recourse to political rascality and
unwarranted rehearsals in anarchy. Mr. Yar'dua's inaugural address
has caught the essence of what needs to be done: reform the electoral
system to prevent future fraud. I think the opposition should lead
this urgent crusade.
Dr. Amuta,
Lagos-based Executive Editor of Houston-based USAfricaonline.com and
USAfrica multimedia networks, is author of the book, 'The Theory of
African Literature: Implications for Practical Criticism.' He wrote
in April 2007 the essay: Presidential
Succession and National Stability following 2007 Nigeria'
His column on public policy appears in our special events
international magazine, CLASS
The European Parliament on Thursday (May 24, 2007) urged the EU to
withhold all financial aid to the Nigerian government until the
African country holds new elections. "EU aid to Nigeria should not be
given to federal or state structures until new, credible elections
have been held," the European Parliament said in a non-binding
resolution. Such resolutions are often issued to pressure EU member
states and the executive Commission in Brussels.
The EU said last month's state and federal elections in Nigeria, won by the governing party, fell short of basic standards and could not be considered credible, free and fair. The EU has earmarked nearly 500-million euro (about R4,7-billion) over the last five years for different projects in Nigeria, most of them focused on good governance, health and water supply and sanitation. Meanwhile, a coalition of Opposition Presidential Candidates asked Senate President Ken Nnamani to assume executive powers on May 29, when Obasanjo's term is up, and to disband the national election commission.
Many Nigerians still feel disappointed that a man (Obasanjo)
who had gained so much from Nigeria would cling so tightly to power,
even against the popular will of the people, moreso with age, energy
and fresh ideas for a new era not on his side.
Also, USAfricaonline.com review of Nigeria's recent history show that
President Obasanjo seems to be moving rapidly into the zone of
ill-repute of his former military colleagues who, like him, refused
to leave office when it was time to go. Gen. yakubu Gowon in 1975;
Gen. Ibrahim Babangida in 1993; Gen. Sani Abacha in1995, 1996, 1997,
1998. More baffling many Nigerians we interviewed recall is the
lessons of the excesses of the late Gen. Abach who jailed Obasanjo
while the former schemed to remain in power. For the special
report by USAfrica multimedia networks' Publisher Chido Nwangwu,
click on 3rd
term.
DEMOCRACY
WATCH: What Bush Should Tell
Obasanjo.... By Chido
Nwangwu (Founder and Publisher of USAfricaonline.com)
custodian
and elevator, chronicler and essayist, goodwill ambassador and man of
progressive rock-ribbed principles, the Eagle
on the Iroko, Ugo n'abo Professor Chinua
Achebe, has recently been selected by a
distinguished jury of scholars and critics (from 13 countries of
African life and literature) as the writer of the Best book (Things
Fall Apart, 1958) written in the twentieth century regarding Africa.
Reasonably, Achebe's message has been neither dimmed nor dulled by
time and clime. He's our pathfinder, the intellectual godfather of
millions of Africans and lovers of the fine
art of good writing. Achebe's cultural contexts are, at once,
pan-African, globalist and local; hence, his literary
contextualizations soar beyond the confines of Umuofia and any Igbo
or Nigerian setting of his creative imagination or historical recall.
His globalist underpinnings and outlook are truly reflective of
the true essence of his Igbo world-view, his Igbo upbringing and
disposition. Igbos and Jews share (with a few other other cultures)
this pan-global disposition to issues of art, life, commerce,
juridical pursuits, and quest to be republicanist in terms of the
vitality of the individual/self. In Achebe's works, the centrality of
Chi (God) attains an additional clarity in the Igbo cosmology... it
is a world which prefers a quasi-capitalistic business attitude while
taking due cognizance of the usefulness of the whole, the community.
I've studied, lived and tried to better understand, essentially, the
rigor and towering moral certainties which Achebe have employed in
most of his works and his world. I know, among other reasons, because
I share the same ancestry with him. Permit me to attempt a brief
sentence, with that Achebean simplicty and clarity. Here,
folks, what the world has known since 1958: Achebe is good! Eagle on
the Iroko, may your Lineage endure! There has never been one like
you!
Ugo n'abo, chukwu gozie gi oo!. Chido
Nwangwu, recipient of the Journalism Excellence award (1997), is
Founder and Publisher of USAfricaonline.com (first African-owned
U.S.-based professional newspaper to be published on the internet),
USAfrica The Newspaper,
CLASS magazine and The
Black Business Journal. He has served as an adviser to the
Mayor of Houston on international business (Africa) and appears as an
analyst on CNN, VOA, NPR, CBS News, NBC and ABC news affiliates.
This USAfricaonline.com commentary is copyrighted. Archiving
on any other web site or newspaper is unauthorized except with a
Written Approval by USAfricaonline.com
Founder. CLASS
is the social events, heritage excellence and style magazine for
Africans in north America, described by The New York Times as the
magazine for affluent Africans
in America. It is published by
professional journalists and leading mulitmedia leaders and
pioneers.
|
Nelson Mandela, Tribute to the world's political superstar and Lion of Africa Winnie Madikizela-Mandela's burden mounts with murder charges, trials Why Bush should focus on dangers facing Nigeria's return to democracy and Obasanjo's slipperyslide ![]() A KING FOR ALL TIMES: Why Martin Luther King's legacy and vision are relevant into 21st century.
Since 1958, Achebe's "Things Fall Apart" set a standard of artistic excellence, and more. By Douglas Killam Why Chinua Achebe, the Eagle on the Iroko, is Africa's writer of the century. By Chido Nwangwu(First written on March 1, 2002, for USAfrica, updated for Prof. Achebe's 74th Birthday tribute on November 16, 2004, and published in CLASS magazine same month): Africa's most acclaimed and fluent writer of the English Language, the most translated writer of Black heritage in the world, broadcaster extraordinaire, social conscience of millions, cultural custodian and elevator, chronicler and essayist, goodwill ambassador and man of progressive rock-ribbed principles, the Eagle on the Iroko, Ugo n'abo Professor Chinua Achebe, has recently been selected by a distinguished jury of scholars and critics (from 13 countries of African life and literature) as the writer of the Best book (Things Fall Apart, 1958) written in the twentieth century regarding Africa. Reasonably, Achebe's message has been neither dimmed nor dulled by time and clime. He's our pathfinder, the intellectual godfather of millions of Africans and lovers of the fine
art of good writing. Achebe's cultural contexts are, at
once, pan-African, globalist and local; hence, his literary
contextualizations soar beyond the confines of Umuofia and
any Igbo or Nigerian setting of his creative imagination or
historical recall.
His globalist underpinnings and outlook are truly
reflective of the true essence of his Igbo world-view, his
Igbo upbringing and disposition. Igbos and Jews share (with
a few other other cultures) this pan-global disposition to
issues of art, life, commerce, juridical pursuits, and quest
to be republicanist in terms of the vitality of the
individual/self. In Achebe's works, the centrality of Chi
(God) attains an additional clarity in the Igbo cosmology...
it is a world which prefers a quasi-capitalistic business
attitude while taking due cognizance of the usefulness of
the whole, the community. I've studied, lived and tried to
better understand, essentially, the rigor and towering moral
certainties which Achebe have employed in most of his works
and his world. I know, among other reasons, because I share
the same ancestry with him. Permit me to attempt a brief
sentence, with that Achebean simplicty and clarity.
Here, folks, what the world has known since 1958: Achebe is
good! Eagle on the Iroko, may your Lineage endure! There has
never been one like you! |
22 million Africans HIV-infected, ill with AIDS while African leaders ignore disaster-in-waiting In a special report a few hours after the history-making nomination, USAfricaonline.com Founder and Publisher Chido Nwangwu places Powell within the trajectory of history and into his unfolding clout and relevance in an essay titled 'Why Colin Powell brings gravitas, credibility and star power to Bush presidency.' Powell named Secretary State by G.W. Bush; bipartisan commendations follow. Beyond U.S. electoral shenanigans, rewards and dynamics of a democratic republic hold lessons for African politics. Bush's position on Africa is "ill-advised." The position stated by Republican presidential aspirant and Governor of Texas, George Bush where he
said that "Africa will not be an area of priority" in his
presidency has been questioned by
USAfricaonline.com Publisher Chido
Nwangwu. He added that Bush's "pre-election position was
neither validated by the economic exchanges nor
geo-strategic interests of our two continents."
These views were
stated during an interview CNN's anchor Bernard Shaw and
senior analyst Jeff Greenfield had with Mr. Nwangwu on
Saturday November 18, 2000 during a special edition of
'Inside Politics 2000.' ![]() Apple announces Titanium, "killer apps" and other ground-breaking products for 2001. iTunes makes a record 500,000 downloads. Steve Jobs extends digital magic CLASS is the social events, heritage excellence and style magazine for Africans in north America, described by The New York Times as the magazine for affluent Africans in America. It is published by professional journalists and leading mulitmedia leaders and pioneers. |