
|
Does your web site raise Questions? Get a BETTER WEB SITE and FASTER SOLUTIONS from the Experts. |
The Coming Apathy: Africa policy under a Bush administration
By Dr. SALIH BOOKER
Special to USAfricaonline.com
USAfrica The Newspaper
In
Africa, a Bush White House will likely concentrate on helping its oil
industry friends reap maximum profits with minimum constraints, and
it will have absolutely no sense of responsibility for past American
misadventures, or for global problems like AIDS or refugees.In Africa, a Bush White House will likely concentrate on helping its oil industry friends reap maximum profits with minimum constraints, and it will have absolutely no sense of responsibility for past American misadventures, or for global problems like AIDS or refugees. But events and activism in Africa plus grassroots pressure in the U.S. and internationally could change all of that, as it did during the White House tenure of the last Republican Africaphobe.
Ironically, those chosen to set international priorities for Bush will likely include two loyal African-Americans, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, who will probably not deviate from the Bush-Cheney exclusion of Africa from the U.S. global agenda. Neither Powell nor Rice has shown any particular interest in or special knowledge of African issues. Both have repeatedly pledged their allegiance to a strong unilateralist view of the use of U.S. power, based on the traditional geopolitical concepts of the national interest held by the white American elite. Africans are invisible on their policy radar screens though all too visible on CNN for the Texas governor's taste.
"No one liked to see it on our TV screens," said Bush, when asked about genocide in Rwanda in 1994, but Clinton "did the right thing," he argued, in deciding not to act to stop the slaughter. Bush ignored the fact that the U.S. also failed to support and indeed blocked multilateral action by the United Nations. This false dichotomy between bilateral intervention and noninvolvement is common among U.S. policymakers. But the concessions of Bush's team to multilateral options are likely to be particularly scant.
The need for multilateral support for peace and security rather than continued expansion of unaccountable bilateral military ties is one of the highest priority issues affecting Africa. But hard-line U.S. unilateralism will likely make a bad situation worse. When not ignoring African security crises, the new administration will likely attempt to "delegate" African peacekeeping, using this as a rationale for expanding relationships with privileged partners, such as Nigeria, while denying resources for strengthening multilateral involvement. In fact, we may well see a repeat of this year's abortive effort by congressional Republicans to cut funds for UN peacekeeping in Africa to zero.
On two other African priority issues, however - debt cancellation and the HIV/AIDS pandemic - public pressure has a chance to cross traditional political barriers and make unexpected breakthroughs, as did the struggle for sanctions against apartheid in the Reagan era. Action on both issues currently receives at least nominal support across party lines, as evidenced in Bush's unexpected though qualified rhetorical endorsement of debt relief in the debates. Any significant action will require spending money and opposing vested economic interests, and therefore movement on these issues will initially become even more difficult than it has been to date. But there are openings.
Republican skepticism of multilateral institutions has even found some common ground with critics on the political left, as in the Meltzer Commission's criticism of international financial institutions and the recent congressional resolution mandating U.S. opposition to user fees for primary health and education in poor countries. More narrowly, many favor debt cancellation for practical business reasons (those with unpayable debts are unlikely to be good customers). If debt cancellation makes it high enough on the next administration's agenda, there will be room for debate on policy.
Complacency, however, is more likely. "We already did debt relief last year," policymakers may disingenuously conclude, "and now poor countries should take care of their own problems." The fact that the majority of countries affected are African will make it easy for a Bush administration to give debt relief lower priority. In the context of a Bush presidency and a divided Congress, breaking through the systemic American disdain for Africa will not happen unless there are real shifts in public perceptions, comparable to those that happened in the 1980s regarding apartheid in South Africa. By any measure of catastrophic events in human history, the HIV/AIDS pandemic should serve as such a wake-up call.
At the end of the year 2000, there are more than 25 million Africans living with HIV/AIDS more than 70% of the adults and more than 80 percent of the children who are infected worldwide. Almost four million Africans were newly infected during the year 2000. Yet almost no one in Africa is receiving the expensive treatments now available to people living with HIV/AIDS in rich countries.
Pharmaceutical companies, under pressure, are offering discounts on drugs. But they are also continuing their campaign against the production and import of generic alternatives. Congress approved the administration request for a little more than $300 million in new funds for HIV/AIDS worldwide in fiscal year 2001. Yet the scale of the catastrophe has still not struck home. Nor has the awareness that AIDS' unequal impact both results from and reinforces economic inequalities, amounting to a global apartheid.
If we regard HIV/AIDS as just another disease, and those affected
as excluded from our common humanity, then the odds of making Africa
a priority in the years ahead are low indeed. If its horrors can
serve to remind enough of us of our common humanity, then even those
with the most exclusionary agendas will be forced to respond. For the
Bush administration, it will be a clear choice between black gold and
Black people. These views were
stated during an interview CNN's anchor Bernard Shaw and
senior analyst Jeff Greenfield had with Mr. Nwangwu on
Saturday November 18, 2000 during a special edition of
'Inside Politics 2000.'
Dr. Booker is the director of both The Africa Fund in New York and
the Africa Policy Information Center in Washington.
PRESIDENTIAL
TRANSITION
Powell
nominated to serve as Secretary of State by G.W. Bush;
bipartisan commendations follow.
In
a special report soon after after the history-making
nomination, USAfricaonline.com
Founder and Publisher Chido Nwangwu places Powell within the
trajectory of history and into his unfolding clout and
relevance in an essay titled 'Why Colin Powell brings
gravitas, credibility and star power to Bush
presidency.'
AFRICA
AND THE U.S. ELECTIONS
Beyond U.S.
electoral shenanigans, rewards and dynamics of a democratic
republic hold
lessons
for
African politics.
The U.S. Elections, Political
System and Africa. By Profs. Cassandra R.
Veney and Paul Tiyambe Zeleza
Africa suffers the
scourge of the virus
Kgomotso Mahlangu, a
five-month-old AIDS patient in a hospital in the Kalafong
township near Pretoria, South Africa, captures the more
painful profile of the catastrophic and sweeping impact of
the virus in the continent. USAfricaonline
special report is titled AIDS, Africa and
Kgomotso.
USAfricaonline
LITERATURE
As Chinua
Achebe
turned 70, Africa's preeeminent statesman Nelson
Mandela, Toni Morrison, Wole Soyinka, Ali Mazrui, Leon
Botstein (president of Bard College), Ojo Maduekwe, Emmanuel
Obiechina, Ngugi wa Thinong'o, Micere Mugo, Michael
Thelwell, Niyi Osundare, and an army of some of the world's
leading writers, arts scholars and others joined to pay
tribute to him at Bard College in New
York.
COMMUNITY
INTEREST
Why the revisionist
forces of racist oppression in South Africa should
not
be allowed to
intimidate Ron and Charlayne Gault.

![]()
CONTINENTAL
AGENDA
Bush's position on
Africa
is "ill-advised."
The position
stated by Republican presidential aspirant and Governor of
Texas, George Bush where
he
said that "Africa will not be an area of priority" in his
presidency has been questioned by
USAfricaonline.com Publisher Chido
Nwangwu. He added that Bush's "pre-election position was
neither validated by the economic exchanges nor
geo-strategic interests of our two continents."
Nwangwu,
adviser to the Mayor of Houston (the 4th largest city in the
U.S., and immigrant home to thousands of Africans) argued
further that "the issues of the heritage interests of 35
million African-Americans in Africa, the volume and value of
oil business between between the U.S and Nigeria and the
horrendous AIDS crisis in Africa do not lend any basis for
Governor Bush's ill-advised
position which
removes Africa from fair consideration" were he to be
elected president.
By Alverna Johnson
"The
American people have now spoken, but it's going to take a
little while to determine exactly what they said." U.S.
President Bill Clinton.
A nation of Polls and Predictions
By Prof. Walt Brasch,
columnist for USAfricaonline.com
Blacks
and the 2000 U.S. Vote
Rev. Jesse Jackson and NAACP's Kweisi Mfume are leading
the charge against intimidation of Blacks in Florida and
west Vrginia during the November 8, 2000
elections.